U11 (1999) Girls Soccer |
Ranger96 wrote: ... Looks like the coach can’t make up their mind during the tryouts. And drags the girl through the winter thinking they have a team to play on ...
... I will agree that a two day tryout is hard to find the good from the weak or the diamond in the rough but you can’t string along kids where they develop friendships ...
jack straw wrote:And Ranger96 I think you've got the whole switching clubs thing backwards. If a club has 3 or 4 rep teams the girl who is cut in the spring is more likely to have friends on the B or C teams and therefore less likely to go elsewhere.
After 4 years on the a and b teams, my daughter knows all the girls on those teams, half the c team and another 10 girls who have moved elsewhere.
kids1st wrote:Ranger, there is good reason to postpone final selections until February and it has nothing to do with the coach's inability to make decisions back in October. Many coaches look to give more players the opportunity to develop through the indoor season. Players at this age have not peaked ... far from it ... some will surpass others after just a few months of training. And the indoor season provides coaches with an opportunity to evaluate a player's rate of progress, which is more important than a player's current ability.
Having said that, if the indoor program does not deliver quality training ... then I get your point.
Ranger96 wrote:jack straw wrote:And Ranger96 I think you've got the whole switching clubs thing backwards. If a club has 3 or 4 rep teams the girl who is cut in the spring is more likely to have friends on the B or C teams and therefore less likely to go elsewhere.
After 4 years on the a and b teams, my daughter knows all the girls on those teams, half the c team and another 10 girls who have moved elsewhere.
Jackstraw
I do understand your thoughts but from my experience that once an A player they think they should always be an A player even if the B team from the club is just as strong as the other clubs A teams thus they move. Also a lot of parents have the idea that an A coach is better that the B coach which is often not the case.
jack straw wrote:Ranger96 wrote:jack straw wrote:And Ranger96 I think you've got the whole switching clubs thing backwards. If a club has 3 or 4 rep teams the girl who is cut in the spring is more likely to have friends on the B or C teams and therefore less likely to go elsewhere.
After 4 years on the a and b teams, my daughter knows all the girls on those teams, half the c team and another 10 girls who have moved elsewhere.
Jackstraw
I do understand your thoughts but from my experience that once an A player they think they should always be an A player even if the B team from the club is just as strong as the other clubs A teams thus they move. Also a lot of parents have the idea that an A coach is better that the B coach which is often not the case.
Actually it's the parents more than the kids who think "once an A player, always an A player". When my daughter went from the A to B team it was the best thing that ever happened to her. She gained all kinds of confidence being the big fish in the small pond and she loves to play for her current coach. Part of me knows that she could go to another club and play at the top level, but she's happy where she is and is probably getting better coaching anyway.
kids1st wrote:Ranger, teams folding is not on anyone's wishlist (we hope). The majority of teams that carry oversized rosters indoors do so with the sole purpose of developing more players over a longer period of time. This is a positive in the younger age groups, IMO.
Return to Girls Soccer: U12 (1998) and below
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest